Do Not Separate Residents of Lagos Along Ethnic Lines - Rhodes-Vivour Fires Obasa, Speaker of the Lagos State Assembly,

Rhodes-Vivour stated that the law would discourage local and international investment in the economy of Lagos.

In his acceptance speech following his re-election as Speaker of the Lagos House of Assembly, Obasa stated that Lagos is a Yoruba land and that lawmakers will go to any length to defend the state's natives, even if it means overturning the law.

However, in a statement posted to his Twitter account on Thursday, Rhodes-Vivour cautioned the Speaker against enacting legislation that will divide Lagos residents along ethnic lines.

 

ALSO READ: Court Adjourns Sitting In Atiku’s Suit Challenging Tinubu’s Victory.

 

According to the former candidate for governor, any law that seeks to reverse property rights in favor of the indigenous people of Lagos state at the expense of other residents is divisive and not in the state's economic interest.

He described such a move as an attempt to undermine the constitutionally protected rights of residents, adding that well-intentioned Lagosians should oppose "the divisive bill."

 

ALSO READ: Some want Nnamdi Kanu detained beyond the Tinubu administration - Ohanaeze

 

Rhodes-Vivour stated that the law would discourage local and international investment in the economy of Lagos.

He said:

By considering this regressive bill, the Speaker disregards the spirit of the Nigerian Constitution and perpetuates a discriminatory system that divides our society along ethnic lines.

 

ALSO READ: "Organised Crime" – Peter Obi Talks About Tinubu's Government Removing The Fuel Subsidy

 

“The proposed bill undermines the principle of private ownership and could severely affect investment, economic growth, and overall prosperity in Lagos State. By considering such legislation, the Speaker is sending a damaging message to local and international investors, discouraging their participation and confidence in the state’s economy.”

Rhodes-Vivour asked the Assembly to advocate laws that would instead “protect heritage, historical sites, and traditional institutions from political vandalism.”


Bruno Kelvin

320 Blog posts

Comments
Chinedu Ekene Eucharia 40 w

Fine one

 
 
Wendyjib 1 y

Wow

 
 
Stellamaris Orode 1 y

Don't do that

 
 
Adeola Oladipo 1 y

It is well ooo